When England’s countryside springs to mind, ‘bureaucracy’ is seldom the first word to accompany it. Her green and pleasant land is a place of custom, of order based on long-established ways of life, rather than of Orwell’s hectoring ‘Nosy-Parkers’. But if you go down to the sticks these days, Nosy-Parkers are exactly what you’ll find. So reads Josie Appleton’s new post in Reason, decrying the slow, silent rise of the rural Nanny State.
Jeremy Clarkson has railed before against the health Nazis who bustled round his farm, making him put ‘No Smoking’ signs on all his (private) barns. But it takes a special sort of person to find the sound of church bells irritating enough to complain to a local council. Or the sound of sheep ‘baaing’. Or the sight of peacocks roaming. Yet all three have lately been the subject of complaints, and all three have been on the receiving end of busybody local authorities as a result. Church bells were removed, and an ‘irresponsible shepherding task group’ formed. The peacocks, meanwhile, were given their marching orders.
This is the extent to which local government has sought to extend its reach into the daily lives of everyday country folk, often in the most bizarre and pedantic of ways – perhaps the most brazen example being the attempt to have the famous Cooper’s Hill cheese-rolling event banned on grounds of health and safety. (The way the ban was eventually defied is telling of just how this creeping authoritarianism is regarded by the average Englishman: with equally brazen contempt.)
Appleton points the finger for the rise in intrusions by the state to the 1980s demise of its great institutions – when their officials, shorn of purpose, ‘became the representatives of blank, empty officialdom, with no raison d’etre other than to subject social life to their bureaucratic tools.’
For those of you concerned, the peacocks, though ordered to disperse, remain firmly in place, the sheep have yet to have their vocal cords clipped, and some of the church bells have been reinstated. Still, now that they have been equipped with silencing technology, we must hope there is no prospect of invasion any time soon; or how else will we rally the yeomanry?
Then again, what will they have to defend? Keep it up the miserablism much longer, carry on legislating, and there’ll be no rural life left.
January 18, 2017 at 7:43 pm
I agree that petty interference in rural life needs to be resisted, if necessary by ridicule. But this should not disguise or frustrate discussion of the true and important issues where interference, bureaucratic or not, IS required. The last fifty years have witnessed a period of change equalled only by the agricultural revolution, two or three centuries before. I just had difficulty getting up my lane as a result of a literal army of foreign workers coming the other way. I have no animosity towards them. Indeed I admire their work ethic and survival skills, but it is a mark of the change that has taken place. The small independent mixed farm, passed from generation to generation, is well on the way to extinction and has been replaced by large mechanised conglomerates that impose a completely different mindset to the land and landscape. Once it was cared for and tended as might be an extension of the home farm. Now it is merely a machine to generate profit. The change has been accompanied by mono cropping, intensive animal rearing and a dependence on mechanisation, chemicals, fertilizers and oil. In fact all the things that have had, and are having, a detrimental effect on natural fauna and flora. Rather than restrained by bureaucracy, it has been encouraged to go this way and the adverse human or ecological health hardly consequences either identified or restrained. I cannot see how the trend can now be reversed. Yes no smoking signs in barns would hardly be the top of my list, but people need to realise that the old bucholic days of family farming that shaped the rural landscape, are now long past, and that it is now merely mass production industry in the countryside, quite as dangerous and polluting, and needful of proper monitoring, supervision and control.
LikeLike